Hangzhou arson is caused by the defect of China's campus safety education?

Mo Huanjing, the suspect of the Hangzhou Blue Qianjiang Fire Case , at 5:07 on June 22 , 2017, died of fire in the 1st unit, Room 1802, Room 1, Unit 1, Building 2, Blue Qianjiang Community, Zhanpeng Road, Shangcheng District, [1] , Public security through the external investigation found that nanny Mo Huanjing (female, 34 years old, Dongguan, Guangdong people) there are suspicious circumstances. After review, Mo Huanjing initially explained the fact that he used a lighter to ignite the objects in the living room at 5 o'clock on the 22nd.

This, like the Xiaolang arson case in Hangzhou and the arson case in Fujian, is a consequence of the arson being out of control . The essential difference from the United States Happyland arson case is that these three cases use matches and lighters, so their subjective Willingness is not killing. If it is killing, petrol is often used at key exports, such as the Happyland arson case and the Beijing Blue Extreme Internet cafe arson. The strange thing is that the purpose of the Blue Extreme Internet Cafe is to kill people, but it is lightly judged. Now this case is a typical accidental injury. It does not know what the final decision is. Public opinion does not represent the law. Public opinion thinks that it is ok for him to die. The law is a child's play, such as the case of Pharmacy. This situation, which occurred again and again and again, was the result of public opinion leading the law. It was abnormal.

Seeing the news, the family of the victim proposed that the foundation should focus on “ improving the level of fire prevention and mitigation of high-rise residential buildings in China; advocating real estate developers, property service companies, and all sectors of society to give full attention to fire safety; and promoting the selection management mechanism for improving the nannies in the domestic service industry. "he do not see it, a core element of the tragedy is defective campus safety education in China. Due to the lack of formalized science popularization on campus, domestic campuses lack the knowledge and content of escape. Do not believe that you are asking yourself, how much escape knowledge comes from your children. If not, it is the dereliction of performance of campus science. In any case, Campus Science does not complete the task of delivering the correct concept of safe escape. This is a defect of our system. The core issues of this tragedy are:

1. Why does arson run out of control? (Mo Huanjing is using a lighter to set fire, not gasoline, in theory, it is impossible to intervene)

2. Why is it difficult to save the fire? (Victims are entirely likely to wear smoke to escape, or to save themselves in the house. " Little fire " comes from the lack of self-help knowledge)

In addition, the spectacle phenomenon that often occurs in domestic fires, such as:

1. Why save people will sacrifice? (For example, those who do not know how to save people in the fire or in the pool, we only look at the results, do not watch the process. You are injured, that is, your escape quality is too poor, no matter how good your motivation. Save lives may have to pay the cost of life There has never been a question of who is worth more money.)

2. Why enter the fire again? (For example, Willow will suffer the most serious injuries in the Karamay fire. The reason is that the reason for reentering the fire and re-entering the fire is because of her schoolbag. Her schoolbags cost the country millions of dollars. How much escape knowledge can be popularized with this money? The manager will not count this account, so the problem is increasing.)

These can all be solved through campus science. Only young people in China, hundreds of millions of people, cannot obtain the right self-rescue skills. Those who call you to save people are liar, and salvation must begin with self-help. Without self-rescue, saving people is in vain. When I talk about self-rescue, someone uses people to save people to refute me. The biggest problem in China's campus science popularization is the conflict between the " people-oriented " concept of self-help and the " collective-based " concept of saving people. Domestic news often highlights the issue of saving people and weakening self-help content. Why is this happening? These reporters have not received formal escape education, so they confuse ethics with escape. The news written by such people will certainly be filled with moral hypocrisy and self-rescue traps. A typical occupational salvation person's attitude is: “ Saving people is our business. Others are people who are being rescued and need to be kicked off. You are dead, it is our dereliction of duty . ” There is a lack of professionalism in the country, so few people dare to express the concept of saving people. Since we have to save people, why do we have a fire fighting system and everyone can save people (dead)?

Encourage ordinary people to go to the fire to save people. In fact, they deny the professionalism, authority, necessity, and importance of fire fighting. Therefore, there is a huge implied logical flaw in the domestic morality of saving people.

Fire is a complex social problem. It involves not only the fuel factor (the more developed society is, the more fuel is consumed), but also the environmental factors (as long as the humidity is reduced a little, the wind speed increases a bit, and the effect of fire spreads completely, so many people are shocked by the fire scene. In fact, it is a result of too insensitive to changes in environmental conditions.) There are many factors. For example, why did Mo Huanjing not save the fire? Because she was also scared, she was scared at the moment of controllable and uncontrollable, so the tragedy happened. In this respect, the United States in World War II had conducted some fire experiments. Some simulated Japanese indoor fires were used to test the use of incendiary bombs. Those on-site commanders were very, very careful and were very sensitive to the timing of the intervention in the fire. If the time of interference differs by one second, the difference in results may be the loss of several hundred and tens of thousands of blocks. Due to the highly nonlinear trend in the development of indoor fires, no one in the United States can accurately predict the exact moment of indoor fire out of control, let alone Mo Huanjing with a low level of culture. Those who hate arsonists often underestimate the non-linearity and difficulty of fire development. In other words, hating arsonists is because they do not understand the potential for fires to go out of control and are ignorant. Because of ignorance, so hate.

Do not think that I am sympathetic to Jiajiaxin or Mo Huanjing. What do they have to do with my life and death? What I worry about is that in order to sentence them to death, we will sacrifice the truth, cover up lessons, abuse the law, and satisfy public opinion. When public opinion is above the law, it is “the murder of people ” , which is the situation of the Cultural Revolution and the Yihetuan Movement. The more backward the society is, the more emphasis is placed on public opinion; the more developed the society, the more it respects the law. Although the law is cold, it is a symbol of civilization. Although public opinion is warm, it is a symbol of backwardness. It's very simple to shoot a man. However, the lesson behind it is to use blood to get it. You have no right to ignore it.

The content of this article comes from the Internet. The article does not represent the view of China Rescue Equipment Network.