First squeeze the bubble and talk about CV start-ups and traditional security competition

In terms of strength comparison, CV start-ups and traditional security companies have their own advantages and disadvantages. On the bright side, traditional security companies have provoked the “big beam” of intelligent security with industry share. But in fact, both sides have their own advantages, and it is difficult for Dongfeng to overwhelm the west wind. Industry experts believe that the short-board of traditional security enterprises lies in AI algorithms and talents. The shortage of CV start-ups lies in industry accumulation and channels. The key to winning is that the two sides can overcome the shortcomings first, master the three elements of artificial intelligence, and let smart hardware, algorithms, and big data land products be applied. In this regard, some industry experts have called on both parties to work together to draw a blueprint. It is worth noting that the premise of the establishment of a win-win situation is that the two sides have the tacit understanding and confidence of the two parties. The two sides can abide by the spirit of the contract. Otherwise, they can only make wedding dresses for others and fight the eggs.

At present, both CV start-ups and traditional security companies have increased their investment in the AI ​​security field and are arrogant on the smart security track. However, it is worth noting that there are still a lot of challenges on this track. If you are not careful, you will lose a lot of tricks. There is a lot of foam and minefield on the road leading to the future. In 2018, security will enter the stage of going to the shackles and the big waves, and a large number of AI projects will be eliminated due to lack of commercial value and capital chain breaks. Enterprises that simply tell artificial intelligence stories will be expelled. The industry believes that security companies lacking artificial intelligence technology business applications will become more and more difficult to survive, and the industry may be undergoing major changes.

Whether it is a CV start-up or a traditional security company, it can only be down to earth, one step at a time. Remove the bubble, remove the pseudo-artificial intelligence concept, let go of the flicker and speculation, find the product landing and application scenarios. When the AI ​​foam is squeezed, the security will be further purified and upgraded, and the remaining companies will better promote the industry. For companies that can continue to win in the game, this is certainly not the best era.

According to Caijing, all current AI security products have an output value of less than 2 billion, and only 1% of security equipment uses AI technology. It is conceivable that AI security has great potential to be tapped. There is a bubble in the industry, but artificial intelligence is not a bubble. Artificial intelligence is not a popular business model. It has a strong and tenacious vitality and may represent a great future. Any innovation and change is endless. Under the impetus of new thinking, new technologies and new formats, artificial intelligence will have a more profound and long-term development in China in 2018. China Security Exhibition Network will continue to pay attention to the new forms, new developments and new trends of artificial intelligence in the security industry.